Home | Archives | Account | New | Hall of Fame | Tag Cloud | Sitemap

About me, bert boerland, About my PVR, MythTV based.
Home » Re: in mail does NOT mean REPLY

Add new comment

Re: Betr.: Re: in mail does NOT mean REPLY

Even the correct translation, in Dutch 'Betr.', from betreft, meaning 'concerning', breaks in most clients.
Worse (FAR worse) is when clients rip out the threading headers, in-reply-to. My client is fairly smart, and uses some fuzzy logic to group these none-the-less, but if both the subj and the in-reply-to headers are foobared then, chances are big I will never reply to you (because your mail got lost inbetween the other 100K sitting in my 200+ directories). Smiling

By Bèr (not verified) at Wed, 21/02/2007 - 3:53pm |

Reply

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • You may link to images on this site using a special syntax
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <A><I><LI><OL><U><UL><img><p><tt><table><hr><small><div><br><strike><b><pre><li><ul><td><tr><blockquote>
  • Insert Google Map macro. Create a macro
More information about formatting options